Subscribe to our newsletter to receive information on new and updated content

 

Athletic ECGs

Warning

The content you’re about to read or listen to is at least two years old, which means evidence and guidelines may have changed since it was originally published. This content item won’t be edited but there will be a newer version published if warranted. Check the new publications and curriculum map for updates

Authors: Guy Evans, Simon Laing / Codes: HAP5 / Published: 13/05/2015

Athletes in the ED, my ED, we hardly ever see them..or so you might think. Actually the definition of an athlete means you come across them far more often than you may first have thought.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of death in athletes during sport. Whether obtained for screening or diagnostic purposes, an ECG increases the ability to detect underlying cardiovascular conditions that may increase the risk for SCD.

As with most patients in the ED, ECGs are often obtained in athletes and can look quite abnormal due to the cardiac hypertrophy and increased vagal tone that occurs with regular physical training. It is important that we, as clinicians are able to decipher between normal changes associated with regular physical activity and those that may represent underlying cardiovascular pathology. By identifying these normal changes on an athletes ECG we can reduce the anxiety associated with onwards specialist cardiology referral.

An athlete is defined as an individual who engages in regular exercise or training for sport or general physical fitness, typically with a goal of improving performance. As you can see, this is quite a large cohort of patients attending the ED. To think of the definition of an athlete more quantitatively, we can define an athlete as someone who engages in >4 hours intensive physical activity a week.

Rather helpfully in 2012, a consensus statement was published outlining criteria that can be deemed as normal on an athletic ECG. If any of these criteria are identified, in the absence of symptoms, the clinician can be reassured that the changes are due to an athletic heart rather than cardiac pathology. These criteria were named the Seattle criteria after the venue at which the consensus statement took place. The criteria can be applied to asymptomatic athletes between the ages of 14-35 years old.

The criteria are extremely useful and are outlined below:

  • Sinus bradycardia ( 30 bpm)
  • Sinus arrhythmia
  • Ectopic atrial rhythm
  • Junctional escape rhythm
  • 1 AV block (PR interval > 200 ms)
  • Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach) 2 AV block
  • Incomplete RBBB
  • Isolated QRS voltage criteria for LVH
  • Except: QRS voltage criteria for LVH occurring with any non-voltage criteria for LVH such as left atrial enlargement, left axis deviation, ST segment depression, T-wave inversion or pathological Q waves
  • Early repolarisation (ST elevation, J-point elevation, J-waves or terminal QRS slurring)
  • Convex (domed) ST segment elevation combined with T-wave inversion in leads V1V4 in black/African athletes

Table 1: Normal ECG findings in athletes

The criteria do have limitations however. ECGs alone cannot always identify underlying cardiac pathology and further investigation may be required especially if the athlete has cardiac sounding symptoms, or strong family history for cardiac disease. In these circumstances expert cardiology input is recommended.

The Seattle Criteria published paper also outlines a list of ECG findings in athletes that are suggestive of underlying cardiac pathology. These are outlined below:

T-wave inversion >1 mm in depth in two or more leads V2V6, II and aVF, or I and aVL (excludes III, aVR and V1)
ST segment depression 0.5 mm in depth in two or more leads
Pathologic Q waves >3 mm in depth or >40 ms in duration in two or more leads (except for III and aVR)
Complete left bundle branch block QRS 120 ms, predominantly negative QRS complex in lead V1 (QS or rS), and upright monophasic R wave in leads I and V6
Intraventricular conduction delay Any QRS duration 140 ms
Left axis deviation 30 to 90
Left atrial enlargement Prolonged P wave duration of >120 ms in leads I or II with negative portion of the P wave 1 mm in depth and 40 ms in duration in lead V1
Right ventricular hypertrophy pattern RV1+SV5>10.5 mm AND right axis deviation >120
Ventricular pre-excitation PR interval <120 ms with a delta wave (slurred upstroke in the QRS complex) and wide QRS(>120 ms)
Long QT interval* QTc470 ms (male)QTc480 ms (female)QTc500 ms (marked QT prolongation)
Short QT interval* QTc320 ms
Brugada-like ECG pattern High take-off and downsloping ST segment elevation followed by a negative T wave in 2 leads in V1V3
Profound sinus bradycardia <30 BPM or sinus pauses 3 s
Atrial tachyarrhythmias Supraventricular tachycardia, atrial-fibrillation, atrial-flutter
Premature ventricular contractions 2 PVCs per 10 s tracing
Ventricular arrhythmias Couplets, triplets and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia

Table 2: ECG findings considered to be unrelated to regular training or expected physiological adaptation to exercise. These may suggest the presence of pathological cardiovascular disease, and require further diagnostic evaluation.

Further investigation is required if any of the findings in table 2 are present on the ECG.

In essence, the Seattle Criteria provide a useful tool in assessing ECGs in the athletic population and can serve to reduce the need for onward referral to specialist cardiology services and thus reduce the anxiety associated with further evaluation. The criteria are not to be used in symptomatic individuals and should be used in athletes between the ages of 14-35yrs old. Further evaluation is required if cardiac sounding symptoms are present or if there is a strong family history of cardiac pathology.

If you are interested in learning more about the interpretation of ECGs in athletes, you may find the FREE online learning modules helpful which can be found on the BMJ website .

I hope armed with this information you will find the approach to the athletes ECG a little easier. If you have any feedback or comments please post them below or contact me directly via my twitter handle @drguyevans.

Thanks for listening!

References:

  1. Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Heidbuchel H, et al. Recommendations for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram in the athlete. Eur Heart J 2010;31:24359
  2. Uberoi A, Stein R, Perez MV, et al. Interpretation of the electrocardiogram of young athletes. Circulation 2011;124:74657
  3. Drenzner J, Ackerman M, Anderson J, et al. Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: the Seattle Criteria. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:122-124

Other items you may enjoy

Paracetamol overdose So the TOXABSE guidelines for staggered paracetamol overdose last night. We bring you an up to date podcast on paracetamol overdose management...recorded at the recent RCEM scientific conference with James Dear
Prioritisation skills in the ED We have a lot of systems in Emergency medicine. Unlike others perhaps, we tend to employ them to draw simplicity, function and purpose out of the...complexity our patients confront us with every day
Are you taking the pee? Urine testing in the ED Urine testing potentially isnt the most glamorous of topics but its an area which theres a HUGE scope for us improving on

2 Comments

  1. sadavarten says:

    Excellent info

  2. wilsone5656 says:

    Great podcast

Leave a Reply