Author: Adrian Boyle / Editor: Tajek B Hassan / Reviewer: Michael Stewart / Codes: NeuP2, SLO1, SLO10 / Published: 24/10/2018
After completing this session you will be able to:
- Define the levels of evidence
- Recognise what makes a good search
- Outline the reasons for performing a meta-analysis
- Distinguish between a systematic review and a narrative review
- Describe heterogeneity and the measures used to assess it
- Describe publication bias and the measures used to assess it
References
- Greenhalgh T. How to Read a Paper. 3rd edn. BMJ Publishing Group, 2001.
- Goodacre S. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 6 systematic reviews. EMJ 2009;26(2):114-117.
- The Centre For Evidence Based Medicine. View website
- Klasser T, Jadad A, Moher D. Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1998;158:700-704.
Module Content
Expand All
Lesson Content
0% Complete
0/5 Steps
Related Posts
Primary Headache
Acute, severe headache is a common symptom of patients presenting to the emergency department. In 90% of cases, the cause will be one of the primary headache syndromes.
Research in Emergency Medicine training: one straw too many?
Emergency Medicine (EM) is demanding and the current challenges are daunting. Already, our education is too often side-lined in order to prioritise patient care. Why should we even consider research?
Critical Appraisal Dictionary
This page contains the 50 most commonly used epide...
One Response
very good module to learn how to analyse the complex meta analysis studies and systemic review.