Author: Adrian Boyle / Editor: Tajek B Hassan / Reviewer: Michael Stewart / Codes: NeuP2, SLO1, SLO10 / Published: 24/10/2018
After completing this session you will be able to:
- Define the levels of evidence
- Recognise what makes a good search
- Outline the reasons for performing a meta-analysis
- Distinguish between a systematic review and a narrative review
- Describe heterogeneity and the measures used to assess it
- Describe publication bias and the measures used to assess it
References
- Greenhalgh T. How to Read a Paper. 3rd edn. BMJ Publishing Group, 2001.
- Goodacre S. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 6 systematic reviews. EMJ 2009;26(2):114-117.
- The Centre For Evidence Based Medicine. View website
- Klasser T, Jadad A, Moher D. Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1998;158:700-704.
Module Content
Expand All
Lesson Content
0% Complete
0/5 Steps
Related Posts
Primary Headache
Acute, severe headache is a common symptom of patients presenting to the emergency department. In 90% of cases, the cause will be one of the primary headache syndromes.
Research in Emergency Medicine training: one straw too many?
Emergency Medicine (EM) is demanding and the current challenges are daunting. Already, our education is too often side-lined in order to prioritise patient care. Why should we even consider research?
Critical Appraisal Dictionary
This page contains the 50 most commonly used epide...
2 responses
very good module to learn how to analyse the complex meta analysis studies and systemic review.
Excellent material;