Critical Appraisal: Appraising a Systematic Review – Migraine
Context
How to Review a Paper
Methodology Design – What Type of Study Did They Do?
Methodology Design – Question 1
Methodology Design – Question 2
Levels of Evidence Grade
5 Topics
Levels of Evidence and Evidence Grade
Evidence Grades
GRADE System
GRADE System Recommendations
Question
Why Was the Review Done?
2 Topics
Introduction
Question
Was the Search Done Diligently?
2 Topics
Is Their Search Reproducible?
Question
What Were Their Inclusion Criteria?
2 Topics
Did the Authors Assess Study Quality?
Question
Is there Publication Bias?
What Do The Results Mean?
3 Topics
What Do The Results Mean?
Question 1
Question 2
Relative Risk
Is There Heterogeneity?
2 Topics
Is There Heterogeneity?
Question
Is It Possible That Competing Interests May Have Influenced The Study?
Is This Study Internally And Externally Valid?
2 Topics
Is This Study Internally And Externally Valid?
Question
Critical Appraisal: Appraising a Systematic Review – Migraine Post Test
Previous Lesson
Next Topic
What Do The Results Mean?
Critical Appraisal: Appraising a Systematic Review – Migraine
What Do The Results Mean?
Lesson Content
0% Complete
0/3 Steps
What Do The Results Mean?
Question 1
Question 2
Previous Lesson
Back to Module
Next Topic
Post a comment
Leave a Comment
Cancel reply
You must be
logged in
to post a comment.