Risk assessment is a key part of the ED clinician’s role and determines subsequent management.
Is the fluid involved significant?
Significant fluids are:
NOT urine or faeces.
Was the nature of the exposure significant?
Incidents considered to be significant include:
Four factors are associated with an increased risk of occupationally acquired HIV infection after needlestick injury (5).
There is insufficient evidence to suggest double – gloving for procedures reduces the risk of sharps injury (6).
Is the source high risk?
Does the source patient have any previous results for HIV, hepatitis C, or hepatitis B?
The following factors would place the source in a high risk category:
If the source patient is unknown, then the usual approach is to assume a low risk exposure.
Learning bite
Risk assessment must take into account both the nature of the exposure and the risk profile of the source patient.
References
Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, et al. A Case–Control Study of HIV Seroconversion in Health Care Workers after Percutaneous Exposure. N Engl J Med 1997; 337(21):1485-1490.
Tort S and Burch J. Do gloves, extra gloves, or special types of gloves help prevent percutaneous exposure injuries among healthcare personnel. Cochrane Clinical Answers 2020.