Author: Susan Elizabeth Dorrian, Sarah Jones / Editor: Lou Mitchell/ Reviewer: Rebecca Ford / Codes: CAP30, CAP4, MHC1, MHC5, MHP1, MHP3, MHP4, MHP5, SLO1 / Published: 09/04/2021
Emergency Department attendance from patients in mental health crisis continue to rise. National hospital episode statistics 2017-18 data showed an increase in mental health attendances by 133% between 2009/10 and 2017/18.
Those who have had a previous attempted suicide have an increased risk, 30-40 fold more, than the general population of completed suicide .
The Royal College of Psychiatry (RCP) has produced guidance relevant to ED staff which include the assessment of self-harm and safety for trainees .
Doctors need to familiarise themselves with safety guidance to ensure personal safety. An accurate initial assessment may include a psychiatric history and mental state examination, including risk assessment of the patient.
Disturbances in mental state may be due to organic or non-organic causes and the features which help distinguish between these groups will be discussed.
Specific terms are used to describe alterations in perception and mental state.
|A group of mental disorders that feature loss of contact with reality||Psychosis|
|An irrationally held belief that cannot be altered by rational argument||Delusion|
|Acute disorder of mental processes accompanying organic disease||Delirium|
|A false perception in the absence of external stimuli||Hallucination|
|An acquired global impairment of intellect, memory and personality without impairment of consciousness||Dementia|
Consideration should be given to the potential causes for an alteration in mental state.
This list illustrates a few of the potential organic causes of an altered mental state .
- Structural abnormalities – space-occupying lesions
- Biochemical changes – electrolyte imbalances
- Physiological changes – hypotension
- Multi-factorial conditions – sepsis
Psychiatric conditions may in part be due to genetic, biochemical and structural abnormalities.
The Health and Safety at Work Regulations from 1992 state that all employers need to assess risks, identify precautions and provide training to minimise risks at work .
The RCP has produced a document for trainees on minimising risk and safety issues.
How do you reduce risk when assessing a disturbed patient in the ED?
The factors to consider are:
Personal privacy issues
- Avoid giving out addresses or personal details of staff.
- Consider whether addresses are obtainable from other sources, e.g. GMC database of registered professionals.
- Avoid loose clothing that could be used to harm. In addition, avoid wearing provocative or offensive items.
- Maintain professional behaviour. Be positive and courteous.
- Check the known risks of patients prior to assessment.
- Ensure other staff are aware of your location when conducting an assessment and ensure you know how to raise the alarm should you feel threatened.
- In an emergency situation, leave the room if possible. Raise the alarm to alert other staff members
Recommended Physical Factors for an Interview Room
The RCP and National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommended physical factors should be taken into account when providing an interview room for psychiatric assessment [3, 7].
No ligature points, nothing that can be used as a missile, and two doors (that open both ways). Specific NICE Recommendations (Grade D) for EDs
Specific NICE Recommendations (Grade D) for EDs
Specific NICE recommendations [7,8] have been put in place to ensure the safety of both the staff and other patients in emergency departments:
Systems should be in place for placing alerts on those known to pose a threat of violence
Interview rooms should be of the standard set by the RCP 
|Chaperones should be present during an assessment and regular checks provided by other staff, for example every five minutes|
|Psychiatric assessment should be available in the emergency department within one hour|
|Mental health nurses should be employed within the emergency department|
|Lorazepam is recommended as 1st line for rapid tranquilisation|
Patients should be able to disclose information in a safe and private environment.
Relatives, friends and third parties, e.g. police should not be informed of what occurs within the consultation.
There are specific instances where confidentiality can be breached and these are referred to in the General Medical Council’s (GMC) guidance for doctors .
Before breaching confidentiality, the patient’s consent should first be sought. If consent is refused you should discuss the matter further with your Trust legal department and your medical defence union.
Examples of instances where confidentiality may be breached include disclosures:
- Required by law, e.g. notification of a communicable disease
- Relating to the courts or litigation, e.g. specific requests from a judge for relevant information
- Relating to statutory regulatory bodies, e.g. DVLA, where a patient poses a threat to the public
- In the public interest, e.g. patient has disclosed involvement in serious criminal activity such as terrorism
- To protect the patient or others, e.g. patient expresses homicidal intent towards a specific person.
The mental health triage scale can be used at the initial assessment of the patient presenting to the ED.
This was developed for use with the NICE guidelines on self-harm .
It can be helpful in assessing risk of further self-harm or risk to others and highlights those patients requiring a higher level of supervision prior to full assessment .
Various suicide and self-harm risk assessment tools are available including the:
- Pierce suicide risk assessment tool
- Edinburgh risk of repetition tool
- Beck suicide intent tool 
These have all been demonstrated to have a low accuracy for prediction of further deliberate self-harm (DSH) but their use can encourage prompt referral to psychiatric services for assessment.
The Triage Scale
The Folstein Mini-mental State Examination
Before taking a history it is important to assess whether the patient is capable of giving accurate information. It may become obvious after the first few orientation questions that the patient cannot provide a reliable history and a collateral history should be sought from relatives, care staff, GPs, hospital notes and clinic letters.
Performing a mini-mental state assessment can be particularly beneficial in the ED setting.
The full Folstein mini-mental state assessment consists of 30 questions and can be time consuming.
Alternatively, much more suitable to perform in the ED is the abbreviated mental test, a validated alternative assessment .
What score on the abbreviated mental test indicates cognitive impairment?
A score of six or less
Abbreviated Mental State Test Assessment
What questions are asked when carrying out the abbreviated mental test?
The following questions should be asked:
- What is your age?
- What is your date of birth?
- What year is it?
- What time of day is it?
- What address/place are we in?
- Register a three line address and recall at the end of the test
- Who is the King or Queen?
- What year was World War 1?
- Count backwards from 20 to 1
- Identify two people (names/jobs)
The patient should score one mark for each answer that is completely correct. For question 8, the first or last year of World War 1 is taken to be correct. For question 9, patients can score one mark if they make no mistakes or if they correct themselves spontaneously.
A history should be sought from patients presenting with psychiatric conditions, disturbed patients or those with altered mental state. The history and examination will enable a differential diagnosis to be formulated and appropriately direct investigations and management.
The following components should be covered in the psychiatric history:
- Identifiers – Name, age, occupation, location of consultant, Mental Health Act (MHA) status
- Presenting complaint – A brief description, ideally in the patient’s own words, of why they are attending the department
- History of presenting complaint (HPC) – Time of onset, course, progression, associations, severity, predisposing factors
- Past psychiatric history (PPH), past medical history (PMH), past surgical history (PSH) – All previous admissions to psychiatric units and MHA category for admission, current and previous psychiatric contacts, medical conditions, previous surgical interventions
- Drug history (DH) – Current medications, dosages, routes and frequencies, known allergies, reactions and intolerances
- Social history (SH) – Employment status, living arrangements, smoking, drug and alcohol history, normal functional capacity, e.g. mobility and independence
- Family history (FH) – Any conditions in immediate family
- Personal history (PH) – Childhood development, family tree, parental issues, schooling, employment, relationships, children, social circumstances, financial issues, forensic issues
The mental state examination (MSE) is required in addition to any relevant physical examination. What are the key components of the MSE? The key components of the MSE and the factors to consider for each component are shown below:
Factors to consider
|Appearance||Dress unkempt, self-harm, physical disorder, inappropriate dress, previous deliberate self-harm|
Co-operation, aggression, disinhibition, distress, preoccupations
Amount, spontaneity, volume, flow
|Mood and affect||
Subjective versus objective, posture, facial expression
Plans and intent
Tangentiality, circumstantiality, associations, neologisms, flight
|Thought content||Worries, obsessions, delusions|
|Abnormal perception||Hallucination and sensory modalities|
|Cognition||Orientation, attention, memory, intelligence|
|Insight||Patient’s understanding and expectations of their condition|
Patients present to the ED for a variety of reasons; some may have a background of mental health issues.
For those who present acutely it is important to assess the patient’s physical state as well as their mental state.
For those having taken an overdose, TOXBASE and the British National Formulary (BNF) can be used to obtain information on the risk of physical harm and the medical management of the patient .
Patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of psychiatric conditions should be thoroughly assessed to ensure organic causes are excluded. This can often be done from the history and examination.
Organic conditions can present with symptoms suggestive of psychiatric disease. These symptoms, however, can be attributed to a physical cause rather than a psychiatric cause .
Signs and symptoms
Signs and symptoms of psychiatric conditions suggestive of an organic cause include :
- History of substance misuse
- Over 35 years of age at first presentation
- Fluctuating behaviour
- Predominantly visual hallucinations
- Abnormal vital signs
- Poor cognitive function
Organic causes that can lead to disturbed behaviour include:
- Traumatic causes – head injury: acute and long term
- Infective causes – HIV, encephalitis, syphilis, malaria, meningitis, cerebral toxoplasmosis
- Neurological – Parkinson’s disease, CVA, epilepsy, Huntingdon’s disease
- Cardiac – Mitral valve disease (anxiety)
- Autoimmune – Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
- Neoplasia – Frontal lobe, temporal lobe, paraneoplastic problems, e.g. hypercalcaemia
- Blood/bone – Haemolytic anaemias, e.g. Ribothymidine 5′- triphosphate, thrombotic thrombocytopaenic purpura (TTP)
- Endocrine – Andrenocortical diseases, thyroid disease, pheochromocytomas
- Degenerative – Dementia, visual hallucinations in partially sighted
- Drugs – Alcohol, illicit drugs, steroids
- Idiopathic – Genetic disorders, e.g. Huntingdon’s disease, storage disorders, e.g. Wilson’s disease
- Obstetric/gynecological – Pre-eclampsia, post-partum
Investigations should be guided by the findings of the history and examination.
They should assist in narrowing the differential diagnoses and distinguishing between organic and psychiatric origins.
Several investigations may be required, but only a few will give results within the time frame of the patient’s stay in the ED what are they?
- Nursing observations
- Blood glucose (BM)
- Thyroid function test (TFT)
- Full blood count (FBC)
- Liver function test (LFT)
- CT Head
Those with an organic cause of altered mental state should be managed appropriately with treatment of the underlying cause.
Delirium, hallucinations and disorientation in these patients can place them at risk of harming themselves and others, as well as causing disruption on the ward.
It is important to optimise the management of these patients by considering environmental factors, e.g. well lit or dimly lit room, nursing on the floor and consideration of pharmacological methods of sedation.
Once a psychiatric diagnosis has been determined a decision can then be made on the most suitable place for treatment. This is dependent upon many factors.
Those that would warrant admission for treatment include:
- First episode of psychosis
- Suicidal or homicidal
- Gross debilitation from illness
- Lack of capacity to consent or comply with treatment
- Inadequate psychosocial support in the community
Patients at Risk of Further Harm
Patients may have co-existing medical and psychiatric conditions which necessitate admission to a general hospital, e.g. those having taken an overdose who require observation.
The Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide (CISH) has made recommendations on in-patient supervision and the environment required for those who pose a risk of further harm.
Psychiatric and general hospitals, including EDs and observation wards, need to comply with these recommendations.
Key features of these recommendations include wards:
- Having no ligature points
- Eliminating physical obstructions that may impede observation of the high risk patient
- Increasing observations during the evening and night
- Conducting a risk assessment prior to discharge
Engagement with Psychiatric Services
Local arrangements exist between psychiatric and emergency services. These are variable and familiarisation with local protocols is necessary.
In some departments, psychiatric liaison services and outreach teams may be directly accessible and can provide rapid support in the assessment and initial management of the disturbed patient.
There are lots of potential pitfalls in the assessment of disturbed or psychiatric patients in the ED. The most common are:
Making an initial risk assessment
This should form part of the initial assessment of the patient so that appropriate observation and treatment can be put in place. It will also guide the actions required should the patient leave the department before a full assessment has been carried out.
Not getting enough history
Collateral history will often be needed to make a full assessment. This may involve contacting relatives, the GP and psychiatric services as well as reviewing previous attendances and notes.
Failure to consider other diagnosis
The disturbed patient can be disruptive to the department. Staff and other agencies, e.g. the police, may wish for the patient to be discharged quickly.
A thorough assessment and consideration of organic causes will avoid mistakes.
Alcohol can alter the mental state of the patient and impair rational thought. If possible, the patient should be sober when assessed. A risk assessment must be conducted when sending home a patient who has presented with mental health issues.
- NHS Digital, Hospital Accident and Emergency Activity, 2017-18
- Harris E.C, Barraclough B. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorder. A meta-analysis. Br J Psych 1997;170:205 – 228.
- Royal College of Psychiatry Safety for trainees in psychiatry.
- Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM. Rosen’s Emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice, 6th edition. 1726 – 1740.
- Health and safety at work 1992.
- NICE guideline: Violence and aggression.
- Bushman BJ, Cooper M, Brad J. Effects of Alcohol on human aggression: an integrated research review. Psychol Bulletin May 1990;107(3):341 – 354.
- GMC guidance on confidentiality.
- NICE. Clincal guideline 16: Self-harm.
- Broadbent M, Berk M. Improving competence in emergency mental health triage. Accident and Emergency Nursing Jul 2002;10(3):155 – 162.
- Beck AT, Kovacs M. Hopelessness and suicidal behaviour: an overview JAMA 234;(11):1146 – 1149.
- Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age and Ageing 1972;1:233 – 238.
- Henneman PL, Mendoza R, Lewis RJ. Prospective evaluation of emergency department medical clearance. Ann Emerg med 1994;24:672.
- Frame DS Kercher EE. Acute psychosis: functional vs. organic. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1991;9:123.
- Safety first: Five year report of the national confidential inquiry into suicide and homicide by people with mental illness 1999.
- RCEM Mental Health in the ED Clinical Audit 2014-15
- RCEM Mental Health in Emergency Departments: A toolkit for improving care