Subscribe to our newsletter to receive information on new and updated content

 

Supraventricular Tachycardias

Author: Stephen Meek / Editor: Chris Gray / Codes: CAP25, HAP23 / Published: 15/08/2016 / Review Date: 15/08/2019

Jump to: Top | Introduction | Clinical assessment | MedicoLegal and other considerations | Further Reading

Introduction

It is easy to be confused by the variable terminology used for tachycardias arising above the ventricles: the term Supraventricular Tachycardias (SVT) could be applied to all such arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and flutter. It is often used as an overall label for patients with narrow complex tachycardias who have not yet been fully assessed. In common parlance in the UK though, the term includes all Atrial and Junctional Tachycardias but excludes Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial Flutter is a specific type of re-entry tachycardia closely linked to Atrial Fibrillation but will be covered here with other re-entry tachycardias.

Narrow complex tachycardias are always supraventricular, as a normal QRS width indicates that conduction is down the Bundle of His in the normal antegrade manner. Sometimes SVT can present as a broad complex tachycardia, if ventricular depolarisation is triggered by antegrade conduction down an accessory pathway, or in the presence of pre-existing bundle branch block.

With only limited experience of emergency medicine, one could be forgiven for thinking that SVT is a no brainer a harmless condition of the young simply requiring a bolus of adenosine then discharge home. This is untrue and several pitfalls await those doctors who combine inexperience with overconfidence.

Learning bite

Narrow complex tachycardias are always supraventricular but not all supraventricular tachycardias are narrow complex

SVT can occur at all ages and is usually, but not always, well tolerated by the patient. Although in younger patients SVT may cause only a nuisance palpitation and anxiety, rates above 150, and pre-existing cardiac disease or other co-morbidity greatly increase the likelihood of symptoms such as ischaemic chest pain, dizziness, syncope or breathlessness.

Classification

Supraventricular Tachycardias can be divided into three pathophysiologicaly distinct conditions (see Figure 1):

  1. Atrial Tachycardias: from an ectopic focus or foci in the atria
  2. Junctional Tachycardias: Re-entry which can be subdivided further into nodal or non-nodal.
  3. Atrial Flutter: a specific atrial re-entry tachycardia

Paroxysmal is often used as a prefix and means recurrent episodes

SVT1

Jump to: Top | Introduction | Clinical assessment | MedicoLegal and other considerations | Further Reading

Clinical assessment

Clinical Features

The clinical presentation of patients with SVT is variable and depends on confounding factors such as age and pre-existing cardiovascular state: how much cardiovascular reserve the patient has determines how well it is tolerated.

Typically, patients present with palpitations, cardiac chest pain or tightness, pre-syncopal symptoms such as dizziness, or shortness of breath. Often the onset is abrupt, may terminate spontaneously and episodes are recurrent (paroxysmal). Patients sometimes do not seek medical help, particularly younger patients.

Each of the three main types of SVT will be discussed in turn.

1) Atrial tachycardia

This is a tachycardia (rate over 100, usually 150-250) arising from atrial tissue other than the sinoatrial node an ectopic pacemaker, or rarely, multiple pacemaker sites (see Figure 2).

P waves are present on the ECG but their shape is abnormal, depending on the site of origin of the ectopic pacemaker. Most commonly, this is a benign and short-lived paroxysmal condition of the elderly. A more prolonged form may occur in children and young adults Incessant Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia: undiagnosed, it may progress to a dilated cardiomyopathy.

SVT2_0

Figure 2: Ectopic focus in left atrium leading to atrial tachycardia

Atrial tachycardia may be seen with AV block in digoxin toxicity (see Figure 3).

SVT3

Figure 3: Atrial Tachycardia with AV Block. Note the second P wave at the end of the ST/T wave,
easily mistaken for an upright T wave.

Figure 3: Atrial Tachycardia with AV Block. Note the second P wave at the end of the ST/T wave,
easily mistaken for an upright T wave.

Cardinal ECG Features:

Rate over 100
P waves present, before QRS (antegrade) but shape may be abnormal (distinguishes from sinus tachycardia)
R-P baseline isoelectric (distinguishes from AF)

Treatment:

DC shock should terminate the arrhythmia. Measures to increase AV block may aid diagnosis and reduce symptoms but will not terminate the arrhythmia.

2) Junctional tachycardia

Junctional tachycardias are those arising from the junction between the atria and ventricles, including the AV node, and are due to re-entry circuits.

A re-entry circuit consists of two pathways the normal fast conducting pathway, plus another area of conducting tissue allowing impulses to pass only at a slower rate the slow pathway.

Typically the slow pathway has a shorter refractory period. Normally impulses from the atria travel down both but those from the slower pathway meet refractory tissue and stop.

In some circumstances, such as a well timed atrial premature beat, antegrade transmission travels down the slow pathway which has already recovered first, then can pass back up the fast pathway as it is no longer refractory, continuing down the slow pathway to continue the loop.

Re-entry circuits are found:

  1. entirely within the AV Node (nodal re-entry tachycardias)
  2. in the presence of an accessory (slow) pathway in junctional tissue (AV re-entry tachycardias) where the fast pathway is the normal AV node.

(i) AV Nodal re-entrant tachycardias (see figure 4)

SVT4

Figure 4: AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia

The fast and slow pathways are anatomically distinct within the AV node but rejoin to create the Bundle of His for onward transmission to the ventricles.

Transmission is usually antegrade in the slow pathway and retrograde in the fast pathway as described under re-entry circuits and is known as slow-fast (see Figure 5). 10% patients have fast-slow circuits: this may be identified on the ECG as a long RP interval.

SVT5

As ventricular depolarisation is always via the Bundle of His, the QRS is always narrow unless pre-existing bundle branch block is present.

In nodal re-entry tachycardias, atrial (retrograde) and ventricular depolarisation is simultaneous so the p waves are buried in the QRS and hard to identify look for inverted p waves in inferior leads 11, 111, AVF, sometimes causing a pseudo S wave.

SVT6

Fig 6: AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia

Cardinal ECG Features:

  • Always narrow complex (unless pre-existing bundle branch block)
  • P wave simultaneous with QRS

Learning bite

In nodal re-entry tachycardia ventricular and atrial (retrograde) depolarisation is simultaneous so the p waves are buried in the QRS complex

(ii) AV re-entrant tachycardias

Theseare due to an aberrant pathway linking atrium and ventricle which rarely can be multiple. The best known clinical syndrome is Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW) where the aberrant pathway is known as the Bundle of Kent.

emd_03_006_12_02_50_0-293x300

Figure 7: AV Re-entrant Tachycardia;
Wolff-Parkinson White syndrome: early depolarisation of ventricular tissue via an aberrant pathway (Bundle of Kent)

WPW: ECG abnormalities in sinus Rhythm:

In sinus rhythm, conduction is usually via both pathways: (i) rapid transmission through the accessory pathway causes ventricular pre-excitation although (ii) most ventricular depolarisation occurs normally via the Bundle of His. These factors account for the short PR interval, slurred upstroke of the R wave known as a delta wave, and QRS abnormalities of WPW in sinus rhythm (see Figure 8).

Sometimes the accessory pathway can only conduct retrogradely, in which case normal AV conduction occurs through the AV node and the ECG is normal in sinus rhythm.

SVT8

Figure 8: The ECG Complex in WPW when in sinus rhythm

AV Re-entry Tachycardias:

There are two patterns, orthodromic and antidromic, referring to the direction of flow in the accessory pathway (see Figure 9).

SVT9

Figure 9:
Left: Orthodromic re-entrant tachycardia
Right: Antidromic re-entrant tachycardia

(i) Orthodromic Re-entry tachycardia occurs when a premature atrial impulse is transmitted via the AV antegradely to the ventricles, then retrogradely back up the accessory pathway, depolarising the atria then passing back via the AV node and down the Bundle of His again antegradely, establishing a re-entry circuit.

P waves will therefore be present, but inverted and will follow the QRS, and the delta wave disappears (see figure 10).

(ii) Antidromic re-entry tachycardia is much less common, occurring in 10% of cases of WPW.

Here the accessory pathway conduction is antegrade, delivering the impulse to non-specialised tissue in the right ventricle consequently ventricular depolarisation spreads from this point leading to a widened and abnormal QRS (see figure 10).

Retrograde conduction through the AV node leads to atrial depolarisation and consequently the P waves will be buried in the wide and abnormal shape QRS this may be indistinguishable from ventricular tachycardia unless a previous ECG is available. One clue is that the re-entry tachycardia will be exactly regular.

SVT10

Figure 10:Rhythm Strip showing typical appearances of orthodromic and antidromic re-entry tachycardia

Cardinal features of WPW:

In sinus rhythm, the ECG may be completely normal or there may be a short PR interval, slurred upstroke of the R wave known as a delta wave, and right (type A) or left (type B) bundle branch block pattern QRS abnormalities (see Figure 11).

During episodes of re-entry tachycardia:

  1. Orthodromic narrow complexes, no delta wave, inverted P waves follow QRS
  2. Antidromic wide aberrant complexes, no visible P waves

SVT11

Figure 11:QRS abnormalities in WPW

Treatment of re-entry tachycardias:

Measures to increase AV block may terminate the arrhythmia by blocking the re-entry circuit:

  1. Valsalva manoeuvre: easily accomplished by asking patient to blow into 20ml syringe with plunger removed
  2. Carotid sinus massage under 40s only due to risk of emboli
  3. Adenosine potent and short lived AV nodal block
  4. Verapamil also highly effective though negative inotropicity has led to adenosine being favoured
  5. DC shock highly effective but requires sedation and consequent resource use and risk

Pitfall

Atrial fibrillation in Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

There is a very important pitfall to be aware of when assessing and treating patients with WPW and a tachycardia. It is vital that you check the arrhythmia is not atrial fibrillation. This is because the accessory pathway can potentially transmit fibrillation waves very rapidly (> 300 bpm) if the AV node is blocked. This can lead to a very rapid ventricular rate (250-300 per minute) and even Ventricular Fibrillation (see Figure 12).

Drugs which block the AV node (including adenosine, beta blockers, verapamil) must not, therefore, be used in patients with AF who are suspected of having an accessory pathway (eg WPW).

SVT12

Figure 12: “pre-excited” Atrial Fibrillation in a patient with an accessory pathway

3) Atrial Flutter

Atrial Flutter is a common dysrhythmia in older patients and has similar causes to Atrial Fibrillation. A rare cause is digoxin toxicity and this should always be considered before treatment.

Many patients have episodes of both flutter and fibrillation and patients with Atrial Flutter often progress to Atrial Fibrillation with advancing age or if left untreated. It is unusual for patients to remain in Atrial Flutter long term.

Prevalence:

  • Aged 25-35 years: 2-3 cases per 1000 people
  • Aged 55-64 years: 30-90 cases per 1000 people
  • Aged 65-90 years: 50-90 cases per 1000 people

Male: Female ratio is 2:1

Pathophysiology:

Atrial Flutter is a form of re-entry tachycardia where the circuit is almost always confined to the right atrium: rare left atrial cases have been reported.

SVT13

Figure 13: Atrial Flutter rhythm strip

Type 1 or Typical atrial flutter will have a rate of around 300/ min (250-350/min) and most commonly produces a negative sawtooth appearance in inferior leads II, III and aVF (see Figure 14). Reverse Typical Flutter produces a positive sawtooth in the inferior leads at around the same rate, and is due to the electrical impulses passing round the re-entry circuit in the reverse direction.

Type 2 Atypical atrial Flutter is rare, faster, 350-450/min and arises from a different pathway.

SVT14

Figure 14: Type 1, typical atrial flutter, counterclockwise, with 4:1 block

The atrial rate can be slowed by Class 1A, 1C drugs and amiodarone. Patients already taking these drugs may present with rates of around 200, and sometimes the AV node then allows 1:1 transmission, resulting in a ventricular rate of 200 or so.

Cardinal Features:

Classic sawtooth Flutter waves may be seen best in 11, 111, AVF and V1 (see Figure 13). Sometimes the sawtooth morphology is absent and diagnosis depends on identifying flutter waves at a rate usually around 300 (variable, depending on factors above) or having a high index of suspicion for atrial flutter when faced with an ECG with a ventricular rate of half (ie. 150/min) of this (ie. 2:1 block).

Adenosine can be used diagnostically where there is doubt, in order to temporarily block the AV node and provide a few seconds of rhythm strip devoid of ventricular complexes. The presence of flutter waves is then obvious.

The ventricular rate seen in patients with Flutter is dependent on the degree of AV nodal block: normally the AV node cannot transmit impulses at 300/min so only alternate impulses reach the ventricles, giving a rate of 150/min. This is called Atrial Flutter with 2:1 block and is the commonest ventricular response (see Figure 15).

SVT15_0

Figure 15: Atrial Flutter with 2:1 block

Mortality and morbidity in Atrial Flutter are related to:

  1. rate-related complications such as heart failure and ischaemia
  2. thrombo-embolic events, caused by a pro-thrombotic atrial state and leading to a risk of embolic events approaching that of atrial fibrillation.

Both of these issues need to be considered when intervention for Atrial Flutter is considered.

Treatment of atrial flutter:

Treatment of Atrial Flutter is broadly the same as for Atrial Fibrillation, though the condition is more sensitive to DC shock and less so to chemical cardioversion.
The urgency and aims of treatment depend on symptoms, which are usually rate-related.

The various therapeutic options include:

(i) DC Cardioversion

The patient with recent onset flutter and a rapid ventricular rate may be unstable or compromised hypotensive, suffering ischaemic pain or in overt pulmonary oedema. These patients require emergency synchronised DC cardioversion. 25J may be sufficient though 50-100J is more reliably effective. Sometimes the first shock converts the rhythm to atrial fibrillation, requiring further shocks to achieve sinus rhythm.

(ii) Chemical Cardioversion

Chemical cardioversion can be achieved best with class III anti-arrhythmic drugs such as amiodarone, stall (which has class III action), and flecainide (class Ic) are also used, typically on the advice of a cardiologist.

(iii) Rate control

Rate control may be achieved with amiodarone (although this may well also result in cardioversion), beta blockers or calcium channel blockers (eg. verapamil or diltiazem).

(iv) Electrophysiological ablation therapy

Antiarrhythmic drugs maintain sinus rhythm in only 50-60% of patients. Radiofrequency catheter ablation is successful in more than 90% of cases, interrupting the re-entrant circuit in the right atrium and avoiding the long-term toxicity observed with antiarrhythmic drugs.

(v) Anticoagulation

There are no studies of the effect of anticoagulation on embolic risk in atrial flutter. There is a consensus that since the risk of embolic events seems to be similar to that of atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation should be used similarly ie if the arrhythmia has been present for more than 48 hours then anticoagulate for 4 weeks prior to cardioversion. Long term anticoagulation is rarely required in Flutter as the condition is permanently cured by radiocatheter ablation or deteriorates into atrial fibrillation.

Jump to: Top | Introduction | Clinical assessment | MedicoLegal and other considerations | Further Reading

MedicoLegal and other considerations

Key Learning Points

  1. Narrow complex tachycardias are always supraventricular in origin.
  2. Broad Complex Tachycardia is occasionally supraventricular if there is antegrade (antidromic) conduction via the accessory pathway or a pre-existing bundle branch block.
  3. Typically young patients with a rate of 150 or below tolerate SVT well with only minor symptoms, but those with pre-existing heart disease or other comorbidity, or a rate above 150, may have circulatory compromise.
  4. Atrial Flutter requires different management to other SVT and should be actively sought, especially when the ventricular rate is around 150.

Jump to: Top | Introduction | Clinical assessment | MedicoLegal and other considerations | Further Reading

Further Reading

1 Comments

  1. Kalakoti says:

    Useful and good module!

Leave a Reply