Subscribe to our newsletter to receive information on new and updated content

 

Abdominal and Cardiothoracic Evaluation with Sonography in Shock (ACES)

Authors: Paul Atkinson, James A Connolly, Robert D Jarman, John P Sloan, John Wright / Editor: John P Sloan / Codes: Diagnostics / Published: 29/06/2010 / Review Date: 29/06/2013

 

Introduction

This article will help you to:

  1. explain the indications for an ACES scan
  2. know which probes to use and how to adjust the machine
  3. describe how to position the patient
  4. demonstrate the key views
  5. appreciate the clinical application of the findings
  6. evaluate when repeat, or alternative imaging is required

 

EMR

Context

Bedside, focused or point of care ultrasound is becoming an established technique within emergency medicine and critical care to answer time-dependent focused clinical questions. It has some advantages for the physician over traditional imaging modalities, particularly in the setting of acute illness; it is safe, rapid, non-invasive and comes to the patients bedside. Bedside sonography is not a complete radiological investigation but, rather an extension of the clinical examination to rule in or rule out key diagnoses in specific clinical settings.1 Point of care ultrasound is geared to addressing highly time-dependent and focused questions and, in general, most focused scans become more obviously positive as the patient becomes increasingly unwell.

Hypotension evident in the emergency department is a predictor of in-hospital mortality.2 Protocols for goal-directed sonography have been proposed and been shown to result in fewer viable diagnostic aetiologies and a more accurate physician impression of final diagnosis in the evaluation of non-traumatic symptomatic undifferentiated hypotension in adult patients.3 4 In such hypotensive patients, the rapid non-invasive assessment of intravascular filling pressures and identification of possible aetiologies for shock facilitates early goal-directed therapy. It is important that the clinician does not delay supportive therapy in pursuit of understanding the aetiology of a given presentation.

The Abdominal and Cardiothoracic Evaluation with Sonography in Shock (ACES) scan provides a rapid focused ultrasound protocol consisting of six views (fig 1) for use in undifferentiated shock. Many emergency physicians are already familiar with the views from the FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma) protocol and also from emergency department ultrasound assessment of the abdominal aorta:

ACES1

Figure 1 The Abdominal and Cardiac Evaluation with Sonography in Shock (ACES) protocol: ultrasound windows consist of (1) one or more cardiac views, (2) an inferior vena cava view, (3) a screen of the abdominal aorta, (4) right and (5) left flank views for pleural and peritoneal fluid, and (6) a pelvic view for bladder size and free fluid.

  1. A focused view of the heart
    • The initial view should be a transverse subxiphoid four-chamber view (Fig 2) looking at general overall contractility, right and left ventricular chamber size and contractility, and for the presence of pericardial fluid with evidence of tamponade. This view may be obtained with either a standard curvilinear (marker at 9 oclock) or phased array transducer (marker at 3 oclock). The key to obtaining a good view is to place the handle of the probe flat on the skin under the xiphisternum, with the probe pointing towards the patients chin and then to press the flattened probe down gently towards the bed at maximal inspiration.
    • Should a subxiphoid view be unobtainable, a parasternal long axis (or short axis) view, or an apical four-chamber view can be used. These may require a micro-convex or small footprint phased array cardiac transducer.

    Subcostal view

    Figure 2. Subcostal view

  2. An inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapse index, measured using the longitudinal subxiphoid window looking at the IVC as it passes posterior to the liver and into the heart.
  3. A focused assessment of the abdominal aorta obtained by a sliding transverse view from the diaphragm to its bifurcation (this can be supplemented with a longitudinal view of the aorta if necessary).
  4. A right upper quadrant hepatorenal/lung base view looking for free peritoneal or pleural fluid.
  5. A left upper quadrant splenorenal/lung base view, again looking for peritoneal or pleural free fluid.
  6. Pelvic views looking at bladder volume and for free pelvic fluid.

Learning Bite

ACES Consists of 6 views, ie cardiac, ivc, abdominal aorta, ruq, luq and pelvic

What is the difference in technique between medical ultrasound and echocardiography?

Emergency medicine is almost unique in that practitioners carry out ultrasound examinations both above and below the diaphragm during the same assessment. This creates technical difficulties because the uses of medical ultrasound (all ultrasound other than echocardiography) and echocardiography have developed separately. In practical terms, the images viewed on ultrasound and echocardiography settings are flipped 180 relative to one another.

What is important is to recognise that an echo probe will default to an orientation 180 to a curvilinear ultrasound probe. The descriptions of cardiac windows that follow assume the use of a cardiac probe. If using a curvilinear (abdominal) ultrasound probe, then the screen image should be inverted laterally or the probe rotated by 180 from the described position in order to obtain traditional cardiac views. There is a school of thought that using traditional medical ultrasound orientation is more intuitive for orientation, however this is not common practice in the UK.

Learning Bite

Echo orientation is 180 degrees to a traditional abdominal probe

Echocardiography anatomy

The heart is enclosed in a bony cage and is partly covered by lung; therefore there is a limited number of positions (windows) on the chest wall that allow good penetration by ultrasound. The main windows of use to the emergency physician are left parasternal (second to fourth intercostal spaces, left sternal edge), apical (cardiac apex) and subcostal (under the xiphisternum). Occasionally, the suprasternal window is used.

Looking through the window, several views are possible (fig 3). Through the left parasternal window, two main views are possiblethe long axis (PLAX) and short axis (PSAX). Normal PLAX and PSAX images can be seen in fig 4 and fig 5, respectively. Axis refers to the position of the transducer relative to the heart. To obtain the PLAX view the dot on the transducer points towards the patients right shoulder. The image produced is a slice through the left ventricle, from apex to base (the valve annulus region). At the base the image plane intersects the mitral and aortic valves as well as the left atrium and aorta. To obtain the PSAX view, the transducer is rotated 90 clockwise without changing the location. The marker dot should now point to the patients left shoulder. The image produced is a slice through the transverse section of the heart. By angling the probe, views of the aortic and mitral valves, papillary muscles and ventricular apex (in circular cross-section) are possible.

Cardiac windows

Figure 3. Cardiac windows

Parasternal long axis view

Figure 4. Parasternal long axis view

Parasternal short axis view

Figure 5. Parasternal short axis view

By moving the transducer to the apex, the apical window can be found. This is usually made easier by positioning the patient in a steep left lateral decubitus position. The four-chamber view is obtained with the transducer dot pointing towards the 3 oclock position (Figure 6).This view allows the length of the ventricles and atria to be seen in a plane perpendicular to both PLAX and PSAX views. By angling the transducer acutely to the skin, without changing location or rotation, the aortic valve and root can be seen. Further views (two chamber and apical long axis) can be obtained by rotating the probe 60 and 120 anticlockwise, respectively, without changing the location of the transducer.

normal apical4c with description

Figure 6 Apical 4 chamber view

The ACES protocol allows a structured approach to the sonographic assessment of the patient with undifferentiated hypotension. It uses windows with which many emergency physicians will already be familiar, together with a standard view of the IVC. The dual aims of the ACES bedside ultrasound protocol are to estimate right-sided filling pressures and to identify a likely aetiology for hypotension when there is none evident from the initial primary survey (table 1). This allows the physician to begin to address the likely cause prior to more advanced monitoring and investigation being available.

Table 1 Abdominal and Cardiac Evaluation with Sonography in Shock (ACES) protocol: possible ultrasound findings in shock

Category of shock Cardiac IVC Aorta Peritoneal fluid/blood Pleural fluid/blood
Septic Hyperdynamic left ventricle Narrow IVC* Normal ?Surgical/gynaecological sepsis ?Pneumonia
Hypodynamic in late sepsis Collapses
Cardiogenic Hypodynamic left ventricle Normal Normal Normal Normal
Hypovolaemic Hyperdynamic left ventricle Narrow IVC* ?AAA** ?Spontaeous splenic rupture Normal
Collapses ?Perforated viscous
?Gynaecological bleed
Obstructive (cardiac tamponade) Pericardial fluid Variable IVC* Normal Normal Normal
Diastolic collapse right ventricle Minimal collapse
Obstructive (pulmonary embolus) Dilated right ventricle Dilated IVC* Normal Normal Normal
Minimal collapse

* inferior vena cava
** abdominal aortic aneurysm

The major categories for hypotension are traditionally grouped as:

  • Hypovolaemia
  • Obstructive (tamponade/pulmonary embolism)
  • Cardiogenic
  • Distributive (septic)

Hypovolaemia

The ACES protocol helps with confirmation of a hypovolaemic state as well as identification of possible causes. The IVC can be visualised using either a cardiac or abdominal probe with a longitudinal view taken in the subxiphoid position. The IVC is identified lying posterior to the liver receiving hepatic veins ventrally before it passes through the diaphragm and into the right atrium. M mode measurements of minimal and maximal diameter can be made across the proximal IVC. In healthy blood donors the measurement of the IVC diameter is a reliable indicator of blood loss, with even small amounts (450 ml) causing a mean decrease in IVC diameter of 5 mm.5

In a haemodynamically normal, spontaneously ventilating patient, the IVC collapses slightly on inspiration. This is reversed in a mechanically ventilated patient where there is an increased diameter in the abdominal IVC during inspiration. Changes in diameter correlate with changes in intrathoracic and intra-abdominal pressure. A collapse index is calculated as the change in diameter between inspiration and expiration divided by the maximal diameter. It may be more useful to measure trends of IVC diameter and collapsibility in response to fluid resuscitation; however, there is evidence for cut-off values which can indicate an underfilled or overfilled status. A maximal IVC diameter of 2 cm with collapse of <4050% suggests a pressure of >10 mm Hg.6 7

Learning Bite

A dilated non-collapsing ivc implies that the patient is well filled or over filled, or that there is an obstructive aetiology, whereas a narrow fully collapsing ivc suggests an under-filled patient

A more qualitative approach may be more useful in the setting of a shocked hypotensive patient. Here, a dilated non-collapsing IVC implies that the patient is well filled or over filled, or that there is an obstructive aetiology, whereas a narrow fully collapsing IVC suggests an under-filled patient where aggressive fluid resuscitation is required, and points towards hypovolaemia as a cause.

It is important to interpret these IVC signs within the clinical context and not as a definitive measure of right atrial pressure or intravascular volume, as there is a lack of high level evidence in the setting of critical illness. As such, IVC size and collapse must be considered in association with ventricular size, wall motion and the presence or absence of pericardial fluid (see below). A small chamber size with hyperdynamic wall motion on the cardiac view is consistent with hypovolaemia. Potential causes of hypovolaemia can be diagnosed by further ultrasound views of the right and left flanks and pelvis, aiming to detect significant haemoperitoneum or haemothorax, and of the abdominal aorta to identify the presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Obstructive

The ACES protocol aims to identify not only the presence of a pericardial effusion, but any associated dilation of the IVC indicative of tamponade. In the context of critical illness, pericardial effusions can be a common finding (up to 20% in high-risk patients), making it essential to look for evidence of tamponade. There should be a reduced IVC collapse index, and it may be possible to identify collapse of the right side of the heart during diastole. This has been demonstrated in a series of patients with traumatic cardiac tamponade.8

The ACES protocol also aims to identify right ventricular dilation and hypokinesis with paradoxical septal motion. As a simple guide, the right ventricle is normally 60% of the left ventricle. If the right ventricular diameter is approaching or greater than that of the left ventricle, there is significant enlargement. IVC distension or non-collapsibility, as well as bulging of the septum into the left ventricle, may also be noted. All of these signs, however, must be placed in the context of the patients clinical state; such changes may be chronic in the context of cor pulmonale or previous pulmonary embolism. Adjuncts to the ACES protocol such as compressibility of the femoral veins for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) may be indicated in this situation to attempt to rule in an acute thrombus. However, the absence of thrombus in the leg veins does not exclude a pulmonary embolism.

Learning Bite

As a simple guide, the right ventricle is normally 60% of the left ventricle. If the right ventricular diameter is approaching or greater than that of the left ventricle, there is significant enlargement

Adjuncts

Although these six views are the core components of the ACES protocol, it is recognised that, in certain clinical conditions, additional views may be advantageous. These adjuncts might include views of the femoral vein looking for the presence of DVT by the absence of compression of the vein. Other additional views may include parasternal and apical views of the heart, as well as thoracic views for pneumothorax.

Training

Basic training in focused emergency ultrasound (level 1 in the UK) includes competencies in FAST, aortic scanning and focused scanning for pleural and pericardial fluid.13 Additional training and competencies will be required for a more detailed cardiac assessment and for assessment of the IVC. The level of training required to reliably perform an ACES protocol will need to be assessed in future studies, but current evidence suggests that the individual components of this protocol can be performed by emergency physicians with limited training.11 14 15

Conclusion

The ACES protocol consists of a cardiac view, an IVC view with collapse index, a view of the abdominal aorta, views for pleural and peritoneal fluid in the right and left upper quadrants and a pelvic view. There is mounting evidence for the use of focused ultrasound at the bedside in critically ill or injured patients. Specifically, it would appear to be useful in guiding the initial management while further information is obtained (eg, dynamic heart with empty IVC warrants fluid/poor heart function with a reasonable IVC filling requires inotropes). The use of ultrasound-guided IVC assessment for fluid management in critically ill emergency patients has yet to be validated in controlled studies. It may also be of value in the rapid assessment of the peri-arrested patient when the information is even more time critical but the scan is more likely to prove positive. The six-view ACES protocol is a useful adjunct to clinical examination in patients with undifferentiated hypotension in the emergency department.

 

Case Examples

The following typical case examples demonstrate the potential usefulness of the ACES protocol in determining factors such as cardiac function, fluid status of the patient and ruling in key diagnoses.

Case 1

A 40-year-old man presents to the emergency department complaining of increasing breathlessness without chest pain over 2 weeks. He had previously been well. On examination he has quiet heart sounds, his JVP is raised at 6 cm and his blood pressure is 85/62 mm Hg. A chest radiograph shows a globular enlarged heart and an ECG demonstrates sinus tachycardia only. Cardiac tamponade is suspected. However, an ACES scan shows an enlarged hypodynamic dilated left ventricle. The remaining views including the IVC collapse index are normal. A diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy is made and he is referred to the on-call cardiology services.

Case 2

An EMS pre-alert call warns of a 62-year-old man presenting with hypotension and epigastric pain with a suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm. On arrival at the emergency department he is hypotensive with a tachycardia of 110 and a systolic blood pressure of 74 mm Hg. Initial resuscitation is instituted and an ACES scan performed. This scan reveals a vigorously contracting heart with a hyperdynamic left ventricle and normal right ventricular size with no pericardial effusion. Examination of his IVC shows an underfilled vessel which collapses significantly on inspiration (fig 7). He has no evidence of free fluid or aortic aneurysm on further views. He receives a further fluid challenge and is treated as a case of probable sepsis. An internal jugular line is placed under ultrasound guidance and a chest radiograph confirms right upper lobe pneumonia.

ACES2

Figure 7. Subcostal longitudinal view of the interior vena cava with collapse index measured in M mode.

Case 3

A 49-year-old man presents with acute dyspnoea having complained of a sore swollen leg for 24 h. On arrival he is extremely distressed and cyanosed with a respiratory rate of 36, heart rate of 120 and a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg. His oxygen saturations on high-flow oxygen are 83%. The chest radiograph is clear, an ECG demonstrates sinus tachycardia and a D-dimer assay result is pending. His blood pressure does not improve after an intravenous fluid bolus. An ACES protocol is performed which shows a dilated right ventricle (fig 8) and a reduced collapse index of his IVC which is dilated. No other positive findings are noted and a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is made. He receives thrombolysis with improvement in his signs and symptoms.

ACES3

Figure 8 Focused cardiac scan (parasternal long-axis view) showing a dilated right ventricle (RV). LV, left ventricle.

Case 4

An 81-year-old woman complains of sudden onset of chest pain. She had a collapse in the ambulance with a witnessed seizure. On arrival in the emergency department she is comatose and hypotensive with a systolic blood pressure of 55 mm Hg in both arms. She is generally mottled. Infusion of 2 litres crystalloid fails to significantly improve her haemodynamic or neurological status. An ACES protocol scan shows a pericardial effusion and a dilated IVC with reduced collapse index (fig 9). Further focused cardiac views reveal a dilated aortic root and visible dissection flap in the long axis parasternal view. A diagnosis of type A aortic dissection with tamponade is made and she is referred to cardiothoracic services.

ACES4

Figure 9 Focused cardiac scan (subcostal view) showing pericardial fluid (PF).

Case 5

A 22-year-old woman complains of sudden onset of lower abdominal pain which was associated with a collapse. On arrival at the emergency department she is hypotensive and has generalised guarding over her lower abdomen. The ACES protocol shows a vigorously contracting heart with no tamponade or effusion. Her IVC collapse index is >50%. The other positive sonographic finding is a large volume of free fluid in her right and left upper quadrant and pelvic scans which, in combination with a positive pregnancy test, leads to a diagnosis of ruptured ectopic pregnancy and urgent laparotomy (fig 10).

ACES5

Figure 10 Left upper quadrant view showing haemoperitoneum/peritoneal fluid (PF).

Case 6

An 81-year-old man is brought to the department with a systolic blood pressure of 65 mm Hg, looking pale. There is a mass in his upper abdomen but it is difficult to determine if it is pulsatile due to his low blood pressure. Initial resuscitation is started and a focused scan shows a large abdominal aortic aneurysm (fig 11). Resuscitation is limited to a permissive level such that the patient is conscious and coherent and he is rapidly transferred to the regional vascular unit to undergo surgical repair.

ACES6

Figure 11 Aortic scan showing an 8-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm (between markers).

Case 7

A 22-year-old obese man with a past history of significant massive pulmonary embolism presents with a 3-day history of significant haemoptysis. He is not currently anticoagulated. He is initially hypotensive (75/40 mm Hg) with evidence of air hunger. He responds to initial fluid resuscitation. A chest radiograph shows a small filling defect, possibly infarct or infection. He is too large for the CT scanner. Thrombolysis is being considered but an ACES scan reveals an underfilled IVC and normal right ventricular size. There is a generally hyperdynamic heart and no evidence of femoral thrombosis. Further fluid boluses improve his condition and subsequent investigation reveals sepsis secondary to pneumonia as a source for his presentation.

Pitfall

Attempting a comprehensive examination and failing to appreciate the focussed nature of ACES.

Learning Bite

Focussed use of echo is a skill which can be regularly used in assessing the shocked patient in the emergency department

 

References

  1. Reardon R, Heegaard B, Plummer D, et al.. Ultrasound is a necessary skill for emergency physicians. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:3346.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Jones AE, Yiannibas V, Johnson C, et al.. Emergency department hypotension predicts sudden unexpected in-hospital mortality: a prospective cohort study. Chest 2006;130:9416.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Jones AE, Tayal VS, Sullivan DM, et al.. Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of non-traumatic hypotension in emergency department patients. Crit Care Med 2004;32:17038.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rose J, Bair A, Mandavia D, et al.. The UHP ultrasound protocol: a novel ultrasound approach to the empiric evaluation of the undifferentiated hypotensive patient. Am J Emerg Med 2001;19:299302.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Lyon M, Blaivas M, Brannam L. Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava as a marker of blood loss. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:4550.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Kircher BJ, Himelman RB, Schiller NB. Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:4936.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Brennan J, Blair J, Goonewardena S, et al.. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:85761.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Nabavizadeh SA, Meshksar A. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of cardiac tamponade in trauma patients using collapsibility index of inferior vena cava. Acad Radiol 2007;14:5056.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Gudmundsson P, Rydberg E, Winter R, et al.. Visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography is closely correlated with formal quantitative methods. Int J Cardiol 2005;101:20912.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Moore CL, Rose GA, Tayal VS, et al.. Determination of left ventricular function by emergency physician echocardiography of hypotensive patients. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:186.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Marco R, Randazzo MR, Snoey ER, et al.. Accuracy of emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and central venous pressure using echocardiography. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:9737.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Jones AE, Craddock PA, Tayal VS, et al.. Diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular function for identifying sepsis among emergency department patients with nontraumatic symptomatic undifferentiated hypotension. Shock 2005;24:5137.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. College of Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Sub-committee. Training in ultrasound in emergency medicine: emergency medicine ultrasound level 1 training . London: College of Emergency Medicine, 2006.
  14. Mandavia D, Hoffner R, Mahaney K, et al.. Bedside echocardiography by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:37782.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Dent B, Kendall RJ, Boyle AA, et al.. Emergency ultrasound of the abdominal aorta by UK emergency physicians: a prospective cohort study. Emerg Med J 2007;24:5479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Carr BG, Dean AJ, Everett WW, et al.. Intensivist Bedside Ultrasound (INBU) for volume assessment in the intensive care unit: a pilot study. J Trauma 2007;63:495502.[CrossRef][Medline]

5 Comments

  1. elzamzamiam says:

    simple and informative
    thanks

  2. matsona says:

    Very useful – perfect for my traching of med students tomorrow!

  3. John Lawani says:

    good reminder

  4. hutchinsone6306 says:

    Good use of case studies.

  5. Kalakoti says:

    Quite useful module with supportive info and good clinical cases.

Leave a Reply